QA plan and content inventory
Channels, files, languages, source-of-truth content, acceptance criteria and review responsibilities defined before testing.
Proofreading & Revision service
Asban checks complete content systems for missing, inconsistent, outdated or incorrectly implemented language across websites, campaigns, interfaces and multilingual deliverables.
Scope and deliverables
A typical engagement includes qa plan and content inventory, cross-format content review and defect log and verification.
Channels, files, languages, source-of-truth content, acceptance criteria and review responsibilities defined before testing.
Copy, labels, links, metadata, headings, calls to action, legal text and translated variants checked in context.
Issues recorded by location, type and priority, then retested after correction when included in scope.
Practical value
The intended outcomes are fewer cross-channel inconsistencies, more usable final content and a clearer sign-off process. Success measures are agreed around the organization's objective.
Names, facts, terminology and calls to action remain aligned across the materials in scope.
Missing labels, broken links, unclear instructions and context-specific errors are found before release.
Acceptance criteria and a traceable defect log help content, design and development teams close the final review.
Governance and context
The QA plan identifies the authoritative source, approved languages, privacy-sensitive material, legal or policy owners, cultural terminology and who may accept each correction. Review data and unpublished materials follow agreed access and retention rules.
Before you start
Proofreading checks language at the document level. Content QA checks completeness, consistency and implementation across files, pages, interfaces, languages and contexts.
Yes. In-context review can identify labels, links, truncation, missing states and mismatches that are not visible in source documents alone.
Yes. Source alignment, completeness and implementation can be checked, with qualified language reviewers included where linguistic judgement is required.